ABSTRACT
Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological care during the first state of national emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic in several public cancer hospitals in Peru. Materials and Methods A multicentric cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted by interviewing adult cancer patients diagnosed and treated between January 2019 and February 2020 from 18 hospitals. This study was carried out in September 2020, the last month of the first state of national emergency. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated, including COVID-19 status and cancer treatment features. Results A total of 1472 patients were included;the median age was 55 years (range 19–97). Most patients (85.8%, n = 1263) had solid neoplasia, 13.5% (n = 198) hematologic neoplasia, and 0.7% (n = 11) others. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in 8.6% (n = 126), 1.2% (n = 18) were probable, 1.6% (n = 24) suspected, and 88.6% (n = 1304) negative cases. Overall, 51.6% of patients (n = 759) had cancer treatment delays, 42.5% (n = 626) changed treatment delivery (endovenous to oral systemic therapy), and 12.6% (n = 185) of cases cancer therapy was discontinued. In total, 10.3% (n = 117) of patients whose disease was controlled or in remission, experienced progression of disease during the state of emergency. A total of 6.7% (n = 98) of patients died, of whom 73.5% (n = 72) died from disease progression; 18.4% (n = 18) from SARS-CoV-2 infection and 8.1% (n = 8) from undetermined causes. Patients with hematological malignancies [hazard ratio (HR): 5.11 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.99–13.07)] and no response to therapy before the onset of the pandemic [5.01 (1.44–17.42)] had an increased risk of death among COVID-19 infected individuals, whereas advanced clinical stage [5.09 (2.37–10.95)] and discontinuation of treatment [3.66 (1.97–6.78)] were risk factors among non-COVID-19 patients. Conclusion Our study suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic has an adverse impact on the outcomes of Peruvian cancer patients. In our cohort, cancer mortality was higher than COVID-19 disease mortality.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Development of severe disease and death from COVID-19 is more frequent in patients with comorbidities. Some studies report an increased frequency of severe COVID-19 in cancer patients. This review aims to describe the risk of infection and developing severe COVID-19 in cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was carried out through an exhaustive search of literature in PubMed and Scopus until May 2020. A secondary search was performed to include more studies. RESULTS: The initial search identified 2,192 records, which included 17 publications with at least 10 infected cancer patients. Also, 5 articles were added from the additional search of the references cited by those 17 publications. Ten publications were from Chinese authors. Data analysis showed that COVID-19 infection is more frequent in cancer patients, and frequent therapeutic visits to the healthcare facility may be the cause. The presence of neoplasia predisposed patients to develop severe disease. Advanced age, associated comorbidities, advanced malignancy, and the presence of serum inflammatory markers increased the risk of developing severe disease. Initial studies indicate that the use of systemic treatment may also be a predisposing factor. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of becoming infected by COVID-19 and developing severe disease is higher in the oncological population.
OBJETIVO: El desarrollo de cuadros severos y la muerte por COVID-19 son más frecuentes en poblaciones con comorbilidades. Algunos estudios describen mayor frecuencia de cuadros severos en pacientes con cáncer. Esta revisión sistemática tiene por objetivo describir el riesgo de infección y de presentar un cuadro severo por COVID-19 en pacientes oncológicos. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una revisión sistemática mediante una búsqueda de la literatura en PubMed y Scopus hasta mayo de 2020. Se amplió la inclusión de estudios con una búsqueda secundaria. RESULTADOS: La búsqueda inicial identificó 2192 registros, de los que se incluyeron 17 publicaciones con al menos 10 pacientes oncológicos infectados. Además, se incluyeron cinco artículos de la búsqueda adicional de las referencias citadas en los 17 artículos. Diez publicaciones provenían de autores chinos. El análisis de la información indicó que la infección es más frecuente en pacientes con cáncer, y las frecuentes visitas terapéuticas al establecimiento de salud serían las causantes. La COVID-19 severa es más frecuente en pacientes con cáncer, y factores como la edad avanzada, comorbilidades asociadas, estadio avanzado y marcadores séricos de inflamación incrementan la severidad del cuadro. Estudios iniciales realizados en China encuentran que el uso de tratamiento antineoplásico sistémico podría también ser un factor predisponente. CONCLUSIONES: El riesgo de infección y de desarrollar cuadro severo por COVID-19 es mayor en la población oncológica.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Neoplasms/complications , Age Factors , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/physiopathology , Comorbidity , Humans , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (a novel coronavirus), which was first identified amid an outbreak of respiratory illness cases in Wuhan, China and declared a global health emergency, is currently considered an additional challenge in the management of patients with breast cancer (BC). Cancer patients are more vulnerable to becoming infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and are more likely to suffer additional complications that can increase mortality. Identifying those BC patients who require more urgent therapy than others in the current situation is essential. These recommendations are based on and have been adapted from those similarly published by international scientific societies for BC management. They are divided mainly by clinical stage (early, advanced), subtype [luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), triple-negative], or type of medical treatment and setting (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, metastatic). Recommendations for HER2 and triple-negative subtypes are similar, whereas in luminal subtype there are various options of management. The objective is to adapt guidelines to local context through relevant decision-makers, avoiding duplication of efforts and optimizing use or resources. We hope that these recommendations will help medical oncologists provide the best quality care to BC patients during the COVID-19 pandemic with information tailored to our healthcare system. AIM: To establish and adapt recommendations from those published by international scientific societies for BC management. METHODS: The Peruvian Society of Medical Oncology developed a consensus and propose here a manuscript with recommendations for oncological medical treatment of BC during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Peruvian Society of Medical Oncology invited a panel of experts and opinion leaders on BC working in major health care systems around Peru. Panel experts selected three international clinical practice guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Society for Medical Oncology, Spanish Foundation Research Group in Breast Cancer), considering that these are more representative in COVID-19 management. Also, the panel agreed to include at least one European and American clinical practice guideline. RESULTS: Recommendations about BC management during the COVID-19 pandemic were divided mainly by clinical stage (early, advanced), subtype (luminal, HER2, triple-negative), or type of medical treatment and setting (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, metastatic). Recommendations for HER2 and triple-negative subtypes were similar between clinical practice guidelines, whereas in luminal subtype there were various options of management. One hundred twelve recommendations were reviewed, adapted, and voted. A consensus was made in order to provide best decisions of management, avoid duplication of efforts, and optimize medical resources, considering health care system reality. These recommendations are not intended to replace clinical judgment. CONCLUSION: Most of recommendations are similar, mainly in high-risk subtypes (HER2, triple-negative). Certain societies adapt them to deal with different situations involving the best decision in the management of BC patients.